The romance between Jeremy Fitzgerald and Hannah Winter and their life together
The Sun is Also a StarJeremy Fitzgerald and Hannah Winter’s romance is first legible to Natasha Kingsley as an intimacy that has already begun to alter the atmosphere of a professional encounter. Its later consequences are much larger: Jeremy misses the court appointment that could have reversed Natasha’s voluntary removal because he is with Hannah, and eventually leaves his wife to make a life with her. The novel presents love as a force that changes lives without claiming that its power makes every choice right.
Recognition at the Law Office
When Natasha returns to Jeremy’s office, Hannah Winter, his paralegal, escorts her toward his room. Hannah’s appearance seems changed from Natasha’s previous visit: her hair is out of place, and her usual bright red lipstick is absent. The detail is brief, but Natasha reads it as a sign that Hannah has recently been close to someone. At the office door, Hannah starts to refer to Jeremy by his first name, corrects herself, and settles on his professional title. That momentary stumble lets the personal relationship press against the formal roles they occupy at work.
Jeremy does not immediately notice Natasha. His attention is fixed on Hannah, and she returns his look. Natasha feels like an intrusion into an exchange that does not need words to be understood. She clears her throat before Jeremy turns his attention back to the client; his formal thanks to Hannah sounds, to Natasha, almost like a declaration of love. The scene does not explain how the romance began or establish its duration. Instead, it gives Natasha a compact, outwardly observed sign of their intimacy, then allows later revelations to recast the importance of what she witnessed.
The Choice and Its Cost
The romance is tied directly to Jeremy’s failure to stop Natasha’s deportation. He does not tell Daniel Bae the truth: he missed the appointment with the judge who could have reversed the Voluntary Removal. Rather than attend, he spent the afternoon with Hannah at a hotel. This is not merely a private relationship unfolding alongside his work. His decision has a concrete consequence for Natasha, whose chance of remaining in the United States depended on the appointment.
The delayed disclosure sharpens that consequence. Daniel learns that Jeremy did not prevent Natasha’s removal, but not why he failed to appear. Jeremy’s omission leaves Daniel without the full explanation at the moment of devastating news. The later account supplies what Jeremy withheld, making the romance part of both the legal failure and the story’s pattern of unequal knowledge: Natasha and Daniel bear the effects of a choice whose personal cause is not immediately disclosed to them.
The narration does not turn this causal link into a verdict that settles Jeremy’s character. It explicitly declines to say whether he did the right thing or the wrong thing. That refusal does not erase the harm of his absence from the hearing; it holds the consequential failure and the reality of his love together without pretending they cancel each other out.
A Life Reordered
After the office encounter and its consequences, Jeremy thinks repeatedly about Daniel and the devastation Daniel showed when he learned that Natasha would be removed. The account places this reflection in the week following their encounter. Jeremy remembers Daniel’s words about time, as well as the contrast between his visible injuries and the much greater emotional damage of the news about Natasha. His attention to Daniel’s grief suggests that Jeremy understands the human cost of the appointment he missed, even though understanding comes after the opportunity to act has passed.
Sometime during the following month, Jeremy tells his wife that he no longer loves her and that he believes leaving will be best for her and their children. He then calls Hannah, makes promises, and keeps them. The sequence gives the romance a lasting form: it is not presented only as a clandestine afternoon or a charged office glance, but as a decision that restructures Jeremy’s family life and becomes the basis of a shared future with Hannah. The account does not detail the promises, the practical arrangements, or the circumstances of the separation, and it offers no further description of Jeremy’s marriage.
Children and the Novel’s Judgment
The future account follows the consequences into the next generation. Jeremy’s son never settles down, marries, or has children, and never forgives his father for the betrayal. His daughter marries her first girlfriend, Marie, but anticipates and contributes to that marriage’s end; after Marie, she is never loved quite as much again. She marries twice more, yet never loves anyone as much as she loved Marie. These distinct outcomes keep Jeremy’s departure from becoming a neat romance ending in which a new couple’s happiness erases the cost to the family left behind.
By contrast, Jeremy and Hannah’s children grow up to love others simply and without fear of losing love. The contrast does not establish that their parents’ relationship guarantees this ease, nor does it make the children’s lives a moral reward for Jeremy. Rather, the future-facing narration places multiple inheritances of love beside one another: the pain of a father’s betrayal, the daughter’s enduring attachment to Marie, and the comparative security of Jeremy and Hannah’s children.
The romance therefore remains morally unresolved but narratively decisive. It helps explain why Jeremy misses the appointment, alters the lives of his wife and children, and leads him to make promises to Hannah that he keeps. Its significance rests in that chain of changes, not in a claim that love excuses the harm it accompanies. The account closes on the proposition that love changes everything, while leaving the consequences themselves in view.